Product Family


Head of Property, Construction and Energy, Asia Pacific, AXA XL

What trends are you seeing in the management and transfer of downstream energy risk?

While it varies from client to client and across different geographies, loss history over the past several years has had an impact across on the downstream energy market. Some capacity has retracted, resulting in a firming insurance market.

This has underlined to clients the importance of working with insurers that have a long-term commitment to the sector.

It also reaffirms the need for clients to be able to demonstrate they have strong risk management programmes in place. For example, underwriters will want to see that there are robust physical protection systems in place as well as process safety management regimes.

Insurers also expect clients to have accurate risk engineering reports and to be able to show that they are implementing best practice.

Downstream energy clients usually have the risk appetite to take notable risk retentions – this can help them manage their overall total cost of risk and obtain coverages risks that are sometimes difficult to find or too pricey in the open market. Again, this goes back to the importance of sound risk management – when the client retains a large proportion of a risk they clearly need to have a good handle on the impact of those risks on their own balance sheet and to work with insurers with experience and expertise in dealing with these large and often complex risks.

What about the risks associated with using contractors?

This is not a new area of risk for energy companies, which have been outsourcing and using contractors for decades.  

But while this is not a unique risk to the energy sectors, it’s clear and history tells us that using contractors can introduce elements of unnecessary risk if not properly managed.

Clients should have robust induction processes for contractors and well-designed process safety programmes in place in order to minimise these risks.

It goes back to having a strong – and holistic – programme for managing risks that enables clients to manage both the physical and human elements.

How big a challenge is cyber risk for energy clients?

Cyber risk is certainly an emerging area of risk for the energy sector. Clients are increasingly using automation and robotics and systems that are operated remotely; these can improve efficiency and productivity, but also potentially open up new areas of vulnerability.

The potential for systemic risk exists of course – an attack, random or purposeful, on several refineries at once could be hugely disruptive to the world’s oil supply.  It wasn’t too long ago (June 2017) that the NotPetya cyber-attack affected several major unrelated corporations and countries, which is still considered the most devasting cyber-attack on a global basis.  The exposures associated with these attacks are hard to qualify and quantify, but insurers – and clients – are learning and adapting all the time.

Clients can obtain insurance coverage for cyber risk; the challenging question sometimes can be ‘how much should they buy and is it the most appropriate coverage’?

Many large energy clients retain a portion of this risk and then work with insurers that have cyber capabilities to transfer some of that risk. Working with insurers that have cyber expertise and are learning from cyber risk in other industry sectors can be hugely beneficial.

How can downstream energy clients work with insurers to get the best out of their multinational insurance programmes?

Given the size and potential impact of the risks that downstream energy clients are managing, it is important for them to know their insurers have underwriting appetite and expertise and are not simply providing ‘naive’ capacity.

When we talk to multinational energy companies, they tell us they want to work with an insurer that has an international network and regional hubs of expertise, in order to formulate a multinational programme that is both compliant and relevant to their risk management and transfer goals.

Energy clients that have captives, as most do, need an insurer with a strong network that can use a local partner to issue local paper.

These days, there are a lot of partnerships between oil companies where the respective captives each with take a proportion of the risks and then use traditional insurance capacity on top of that; again, this requires an insurer with both an international footprint and captive expertise as well as significant risk appetite and capacity.

For large energy clients, the sums involved in risk transfer are often significant, and this means it is important to work with an insurer that has capability to deal with credit risk too.

And claims is of course a vital part of deriving value from a multinational insurance programme. It is important to work with insurers that have claims professionals that understand the energy industry, and are able to make clients feel comfortable throughout the process if a claim does occur, no matter where they are located in the world.

This article was originally published in International Programme News.

To contact the author of this story, please complete the below form

Invalid First Name
Invalid Last Name
Country is required
Invalid email
Invalid Captcha

Global Asset Protection Services, LLC, and its affiliates (“AXA XL Risk Consulting”) provides risk assessment reports and other loss prevention services, as requested. This document shall not be construed as indicating the existence or availability under any policy of coverage for any particular type of loss or damage. AXA XL Risk. We specifically disclaim any warranty or representation that compliance with any advice or recommendation in any publication will make a facility or operation safe or healthful, or put it in compliance with any standard, code, law, rule or regulation. Save where expressly agreed in writing, AXA XL Risk Consulting and its related and affiliated companies disclaim all liability for loss or damage suffered by any party arising out of or in connection with this publication, including indirect or consequential loss or damage, howsoever arising. Any party who chooses to rely in any way on the contents of this document does so at their own risk.

US- and Canada-Issued Insurance Policies

In the US, the AXA XL insurance companies are: AXA Insurance Company, Catlin Insurance Company, Inc., Greenwich Insurance Company, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, XL Insurance America, Inc., XL Specialty Insurance Company and T.H.E. Insurance Company. In Canada, coverages are underwritten by XL Specialty Insurance Company - Canadian Branch and AXA Insurance Company - Canadian branch. Coverages may also be underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003. Coverages underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003 are placed on behalf of the member of Syndicate #2003 by Catlin Canada Inc. Lloyd’s ratings are independent of AXA XL.
US domiciled insurance policies can be written by the following AXA XL surplus lines insurers: XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited, Syndicates managed by Catlin Underwriting Agencies Limited and Indian Harbor Insurance Company. Enquires from US residents should be directed to a local insurance agent or broker permitted to write business in the relevant state.