AXA XL uses two forms of cookies on this site:

  1. to enable the site to operate and retain any preferences you set
  2. for analytics to make the site more relevant and easy to use

These cookies do not collect personal information. For more information about our cookie usage, please click here. To comply with EU privacy laws you must consent to our use of cookies.

By using this site, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device. If you choose to change your cookie settings you will be presented with this message the next time you visit.

Fast Fast Forward

Welcome to the Upside Down: Proof of Concept Purgatory

Insurtech proof of concept

By

As I connect with startups and entrepreneurs who are building insurtech companies and ask about their progress thus far, I hear a common refrain:

“We’ve got a number of proofs of concept underway, including with two top 10 insurers!”

That’s great! You’re in market and testing your product. So, naturally, I follow up to learn more:

“Great. Have you advanced any of those beyond the initial proof of concept (PoC)?”

All too often, the answer is “no, not yet.”

Starting with a PoC doesn’t sound like a problem – every early stage company has to prove product value to large enterprises before transitioning to a paid, long-term engagement. However, many companies are getting stuck at this stage, unable to convert customers and move their business forward, staying in that no man’s land between pilots and true customer adoption.

I call it PoC Purgatory.

Unfortunately, because of the maturity of the insurtech market today, I find myself having this conversation far too often with the insurtech startups we meet. From discussion with VCs and startups in other verticals, this is a concept that happens in nearly all enterprise-focused industries. It's a systemic issue when a startup's early customers are corporates.

So what’s PoC Purgatory?

PoC Purgatory rears its ugly head when an early stage company is part of a paid pilot or proof of concept that ultimately leads nowhere. The pilots generate just enough revenues to keep the lights on, maybe $50k here, $150k there, but there’s no clear path forward to an enterprise-level contract or way out of the innovation department or business unit in a way that scales meaningfully. Despite this, the startup has enough of a lifeline to stay alive, but has no ability to use PoC as a model for success and repeat elsewhere. The company is stuck. Like the Hotel California, it can never leave.

Why do startups get trapped in PoC Purgatory?

There a number of reasons startups get stuck in the PoC phase. Here are some examples in insurance that I’ve heard:

  1. The scope and goals of the pilot aren’t properly defined prior to initiating the PoC.
  2. A failure of the startup to address the needs of the insurer: wrong technology; misapplied solution; inability to listen, pivot and take feedback from the ‘customer.’
  3. The PoC is just a means for the insurer to spend its innovation budget with no real end goal; the startup is just part of a technical petting zoo.
  4. An inability to focus on a single vertical: a startup is interested in selling to insurers but is simultaneously distracted by an opportunity in legal. A startup with limited runway cannot afford to get into conversations within a vertical that they don’t intend to scale in.
  5. Bad timing: the Insurer may be genuinely interested but just lost its shirt in another business unit and is tightening its belt.
  6. There is no involvement, on the part of the insurer, of an individual sponsor who has the decision-making capability – and importantly budget - to move from a pilot to a paid contract.
  7. A genuine inability for insurers to use technology or solutions creatively in their core operations, beyond the initial PoC. 

 

"

A startup with limited runway cannot afford to get into conversations within a vertical that they don’t intend to scale in."

 

How can startups avoid getting stuck in PoC purgatory?

Well, to start, both startups and insurers need to work together to create measurable milestones and metrics that clearly demonstrate success or failure of the pilot. Once these milestones are understood and agreed upon, there should be a path determined – both for the case of success, as well as for failure. “If this proof of concept is a success, then we will endeavor to do X next.” The startups should also maintain contact with units outside of the insurer innovation group, preferably in the department whose problem the startup is seeking to solve.

Startups should also keep a couple of principles in mind. First off, it’s important to separate effort from accomplishment. Accomplishment and success come when a startup signs a customer and start generating revenue – meaningful revenue – as a business. PoC revenue should not be viewed as “making it.” No venture investor in their right mind would conflate enterprise level revenue with PoC revenue. Startups shouldn’t either.

In addition (and this may seem obvious), every insurer (or enterprise) is different. A startup should find a few insurers with whom to conduct pilots. If all of these fail, and each insurer does not show interest in tweaking the product until it provides some value, then there is little likelihood for product fit. At that point, it’s time to pivot or start over.

As investors, it’s important for us to see a clear path for a company to move beyond PoC Purgatory. A VC’s goal is to invest in companies that can scale, and the only way to scale is to move beyond pilots and to generate sustainable, month-on-month revenue growth. If a startup cannot present a viable plan to get to a paid customer, its leadership may need to reconsider some aspect of how it is doing business. Does the product positioning need rethinking? Is it a fundamental misunderstanding of the problem the startup is looking to solve? Or is it a tech issue, where a solution is too challenging to implement given current enterprise workflows and operations? Or is the company speaking to the wrong individuals within the insurer or enterprise (innovation versus business units)?

These are all major questions that startups should be asking if they’re spinning their wheels at the pilot stage. Because startups beware: this is the leading issue I’m seeing for insurtechs today, and it can lead to a long and drawn out decline.

Downer’s Index – Facts that may only interest me

  • According to the 2018 World Insurance Report, produced in a collaboration between consulting firm Capgemini and banking and insurance non-profit Efma, more than 32% of Gen-Y customers said they had a positive experience with their bank, but less than 26% said they’d had a positive experience with their insurer.
  • 12% of people dream entirely in black and white.
  • Since 2013, 62% of P&C Insurtech deals have been focused on distribution – CB Insights
  • The longest time between two twins being born was 87 days.
  • 83% of Americans felt they would consider life insurance more intently if it was easier to understand. Millennials, ironically, felt they understood it most, with Seniors reporting the most difficult time understanding their purchase.
  • The elephant is the only animal that has four knees.

Please feel free to share, like and/or comment.

Yours in Insurtech,

Chris

Interested in getting a daily dose of the most important Insurtech news? Sign up for our newsletter here

The views expressed above are my personal views and not necessarily those of XL Innovate.

 

© 2018 AXA SA or its affiliates
AXA XL is the P&C and specialty risk division of AXA.