Product Family

In 2013, Underwriters Laboratories – Fire Safety Research Institute (UL) released the report “Effectiveness of Fire Service Vertical Ventilation and Suppression Tactics in Single Family Homes”. Since that time, there have been heated fire service debates on the when, how, why, and if we should still be performing vertical ventilation, according to P.J. Norwood, author of “Vertical Ventilation: Should it still be a primary tactical assignment?”

Ventilation has been a vital fire fighting tool for thousands of years. Ventilating a building improves interior visibility and generally channels the heat and smoke up and out of the structure. It should be noted, however, that smoke removal requires air movement. The UL experiment mentioned above used vertical ventilation to remove the smoke. In this case, the vertical ventilation not only made the fire much bigger and much faster, but threatened the lives of firefighters as well.

While the UL study examined the impact of ventilation techniques on one- and two story residences, controlling ventilation is an important technique for fighting warehouse fires. An error in ventilation in fighting a home fire can generally be remedied; an error in ventilation in warehouse fires can cause extensive damage and huge losses.

XL Catlin Property Risk Engineering reviewed eight warehouse losses where excessive ventilation was a major contributing factor to a large loss. Excessive ventilation can be created by:

  • making large openings in the building,
  • use of building fans (whether intended for smoke removal or not),
  • use of fire service ventilation fans     

The last item is an emerging issue because until recently, most fire service ventilation fans had a capacity of around 20,000 cubic feet per minute (CFM) (around 34,000 cubic meters per hour (m3/hr)). Two such fans were proven to be able to clear the smoke from a very large distribution warehouse in about 20 minutes without the risk of excessive ventilation.

Ventilation also affects the effectiveness of fire sprinklers, which have an excellent track record in protecting warehouses against fires. When properly designed, installed, maintained, and when the public fire service intervenes as anticipated by the sprinkler design standard, sprinkler reliability is in the high 90 percent range. But, sprinkler design is based on the assumption of nearly still-air conditions. Anything that significantly alters air flows such as roof vents or large fans will alter the fire behavior/sprinkler interaction on which the sprinkler design is based. This is well known by property loss prevention engineers and is routinely checked during plan reviews and loss prevention surveys.

Most articles about sprinkler reliability will discuss proper design, installation, and maintenance. Only rarely is there discussion about fire service intervention. When there is, it tends to focus on ensuring that sprinklers are not robbed of water by fire service hose streams.

However, recently supersized ventilation fans have become increasingly common in fire fighting. Capacities as high as 750,000 CFM (1.3 million m3/hr) are available and can be mounted on a small flatbed truck. Such units are in service with public fire services around the globe.  These superventilators play an important role in clearing smoke and toxins (including from terrorist attacks) from high-life, hazard occupancies such as airports, tunnels, and shopping malls.

In warehouses, after everyone has been safely evacuated, superventilators also run the risk of causing the fire to accelerate after the fire has been controlled by sprinklers. Superventilators can still be used but basic precautions must be taken, specifically:

  • sprinklers should remain in service and fire service hose streams should be in position, charged, and staffed for immediate water application,
  • the fan should be brought up to speed slowly,
  • conditions should be monitored closely, including for evidence that additional sprinklers are opening, and for increasing fire intensity, which can be done with thermal imaging cameras; and
  • if the fire redevelops, ventilation should cease until fire control is regained and the situation can be reevaluated.

This is nothing new. The need to control airflow was identified in the early 1800’s by the Edinburgh Fire Brigade. In the United States, Underwriters Laboratories and The National Institute of Standards and Technology have extensive and well documented scientific proof of the need to control airflow and to coordinate ventilation with fire attack.

What should warehouse operators do? Regular technical dialogue with the local fire service about the installed fire protection and how the fire service can support, rather than defeat it, is essential. This is best done in consultation with a property loss prevention specialist who also has extensive fire service experience. XL Catlin has such specialists available for on-site consultation.


For more information, contact John Frank, who coordinates this effort, at for further discussion.     



Global Asset Protection Services, LLC, and its affiliates (“AXA XL Risk Consulting”) provides risk assessment reports and other loss prevention services, as requested. This document shall not be construed as indicating the existence or availability under any policy of coverage for any particular type of loss or damage. AXA XL Risk. We specifically disclaim any warranty or representation that compliance with any advice or recommendation in any publication will make a facility or operation safe or healthful, or put it in compliance with any standard, code, law, rule or regulation. Save where expressly agreed in writing, AXA XL Risk Consulting and its related and affiliated companies disclaim all liability for loss or damage suffered by any party arising out of or in connection with this publication, including indirect or consequential loss or damage, howsoever arising. Any party who chooses to rely in any way on the contents of this document does so at their own risk.

US- and Canada-Issued Insurance Policies

In the US, the AXA XL insurance companies are: AXA Insurance Company, Catlin Insurance Company, Inc., Greenwich Insurance Company, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, XL Insurance America, Inc., XL Specialty Insurance Company and T.H.E. Insurance Company. In Canada, coverages are underwritten by XL Specialty Insurance Company - Canadian Branch and AXA Insurance Company - Canadian branch. Coverages may also be underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003. Coverages underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003 are placed on behalf of the member of Syndicate #2003 by Catlin Canada Inc. Lloyd’s ratings are independent of AXA XL.
US domiciled insurance policies can be written by the following AXA XL surplus lines insurers: XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited, Syndicates managed by Catlin Underwriting Agencies Limited and Indian Harbor Insurance Company. Enquires from US residents should be directed to a local insurance agent or broker permitted to write business in the relevant state.