Product Family


Global Head of Sport & Leisure and Contingency, AXA XL

On any given weekend during the football season, it is a familiar sight to see pitches across the UK filled with amateur players of all abilities united by their love for the beautiful game.

Football is one of the biggest participation sports in the UK, with about 8.2 million adults and 3.4 million children taking part in some form of the game, according to the Football Association’s most recent “State of the Game” report.

Grassroots football is the lifeblood of the game and a vital network for budding players hoping to become the next Fara Williams or Harry Kane.

But the facilities are, oftentimes, woefully under-maintained because of a shortage of resources.

As well as football, the British weather is one of our favourite topics of discussion. And the unpredictable nature of the British weather can mean that, for sometimes lengthy periods, pitches can be rendered unplayable by waterlogging or frozen surfaces, for example.

The knock-on effect is far reaching.

Cancelled matches result in a dip in revenues for the Local Authorities that rent those facilities out. And that means less money for ongoing maintenance.

The picture seems a little bleak.

The collapse of the proposed deal to sell Wembley Stadium to Fulham FC and Jacksonville Jaguars-owner Shahid Khan last October was a big blow for grassroots football.  An important element of the terms of the proposed deal was the pledge to pump money into community football.

The money is needed, experts say, because drastic underfunding means many facilities are not of an acceptable standard. Recent statistics from the FA show that one in three grassroots pitches is considered “not adequate” and one in six grassroots matches was postponed last year because of poor facilities.

The Football Foundation, a charity funded by the Premier League, the Football Association and the Government, expressed its dismay that the proposed deal to sell Wembley had fallen through. The charity, which each year directs about £60 million of funding into community football, said the £600 million funding could have been doubled through working with Local Authorities, educational bodies and other organisations over the next 10 years.

“Football participation in this country is huge. Unfortunately, those who play the game as a sport, simply for the love of doing so, and for the health benefits, are having to put up with a stock of community football facilities that is in a shameful state,” the Football Foundation said in a statement. “This would have been a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to make considerable inroads into probably the most pressing issue facing football in this country,” it said.

For many of the Local Authorities whose facilities are used for grassroots games, the funding problem is acute, and is only magnified by poor weather conditions.

Many Local Authorities in the UK derive a substantial part of their revenues from hiring out sports pitches. They have a duty of care to ensure that pitches are well maintained, and many use professional groundspeople for this essential upkeep.

Of course, when Local Authorities miss out on money they would have earned from hiring out pitches, they have less in the coffers to spend on the maintenance of those pitches. It becomes something of a vicious circle.

One thing seems sure – we cannot rely on the weather to fix this.

Last winter was described as “unsettled” by the Meteorological Office. While there were periods of mild weather, the so-called “Beast from the East” storm brought a prolonged period of snow, ice and frost in many parts of the UK.

The weather caused many professional games to be postponed, and for the amateur game there were several weeks during which pitches across the country were unplayable.

It is sadly, not uncommon for weather to disrupt grassroots football fixture lists for weeks or even months.

The use of artificial pitches could be one solution to the problem of weather-related match cancellations. Third generation – or 3G – artificial pitches are officially accredited and can provide more even playing surfaces and reduced risk of water-logging than many traditional grass pitches.

Fourth generation – 4G – pitches also have been given the thumbs up by FIFA and, while they are yet to be officially accredited by the FA, manufacturers claim that they are low maintenance, remain soft during freezing conditions, are more ecologically friendly and feel more natural.

But, of course, it all comes back to investment.

Estimates suggest that installing a 3G pitch costs between £300,000 and £500,000.

Of course, over the longer term Local Authorities would benefit from the potential for fewer cancellations and more assured regular income from renting out artificial pitches. These surfaces also can be used for a variety of sports and events – increasing the revenue potential still further. But the initial outlay may be prohibitive for many.

An injection of cash could really make a difference. It remains to be seen if a new deal can be struck to sell Wembley and raise some much-needed funds for grassroots football.

In the meantime, the state of many pitches continues to deteriorate and player injuries continue to rise. Insurance can help to ease some of the financial costs if injury occurs. Certain coverages are compulsory as part of an 11-a-side team’s FA affiliation, and insurance is available to protect players’ income and for health, critical illness and life risks.

But managing these risks upfront in order to prevent injuries would clearly be preferable for all involved. To paraphrase one of the most famous sports movies of all time, it seems to be a case of “show me the money.”

To contact the author of this story, please complete the below form

Invalid First Name
Invalid Last Name
Country is required
Invalid email
Invalid Captcha

Global Asset Protection Services, LLC, and its affiliates (“AXA XL Risk Consulting”) provides risk assessment reports and other loss prevention services, as requested. This document shall not be construed as indicating the existence or availability under any policy of coverage for any particular type of loss or damage. AXA XL Risk. We specifically disclaim any warranty or representation that compliance with any advice or recommendation in any publication will make a facility or operation safe or healthful, or put it in compliance with any standard, code, law, rule or regulation. Save where expressly agreed in writing, AXA XL Risk Consulting and its related and affiliated companies disclaim all liability for loss or damage suffered by any party arising out of or in connection with this publication, including indirect or consequential loss or damage, howsoever arising. Any party who chooses to rely in any way on the contents of this document does so at their own risk.

US- and Canada-Issued Insurance Policies

In the US, the AXA XL insurance companies are: AXA Insurance Company, Catlin Insurance Company, Inc., Greenwich Insurance Company, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, XL Insurance America, Inc., XL Specialty Insurance Company and T.H.E. Insurance Company. In Canada, coverages are underwritten by XL Specialty Insurance Company - Canadian Branch and AXA Insurance Company - Canadian branch. Coverages may also be underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003. Coverages underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003 are placed on behalf of the member of Syndicate #2003 by Catlin Canada Inc. Lloyd’s ratings are independent of AXA XL.
US domiciled insurance policies can be written by the following AXA XL surplus lines insurers: XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited, Syndicates managed by Catlin Underwriting Agencies Limited and Indian Harbor Insurance Company. Enquires from US residents should be directed to a local insurance agent or broker permitted to write business in the relevant state.