(Re)insuring data centres; an evolving challenge
The increasing demand for internet capabilities, driven in part by greater use of AI, means that more and more data centers are being built around the world. Reinsurers are looking to work with best-in-class cedants with strong risk engineering capabilities to be able to underwrite this rapidly evolving risk.
February 23, 2026
The galloping demand for Generative AI, as well as the constantly increasing internet use in almost all facets of our daily lives, is accelerating growth in the number and size of data centers around the world.
While the concept of data centers housing computer systems and related infrastructure dates back to the 1940s, they look very different today. These days they’re often vast facilities in which space is leased to numerous, multinational tenants all of which need uninterrupted power for the servers on which their business operations rely.
Data centers require large amounts of energy to run and, like other buildings, are exposed to severe weather events and other property and casualty risks, with business interruption a critical threat. There is potential accumulation risk caused by numerous tenants operating in the same data center, and with their insurance lead by a relatively small handful of carriers.
(Re)insurers must be mindful of the risk engineering that goes into the construction and operation of data centers, as well as seeking clarity on what is included in the reinsurance treaties they write.
Vast scale, huge energy demand
Although there is no set definition, a ‘hyperscale’ data center typically covers an area of about 10,000 square feet and contains at least 500 servers. The very largest are equivalent in size to about 13 football pitches. And the world’s biggest data center currently is a colossal 10.7 million square feet.
This enormous size, coupled with the fact that data centers need to be operational 24-hours a day, seven days a week, require an uninterruptable power source and need sophisticated heating, ventilation and cooling systems to reduce overheating, fire risk and humidity, which means they consume vast quantities of energy.
It is estimated that the approximately 11,000 data centers currently operational around the world use about 1.5% of the planet’s electricity supply. And that will only increase as more data centers are built. According to the Electric Power Research Institute, in the United States alone, data centers could account for as much as 9.1% of the country’s power generation by 2030. Research by Goldman Sachs, meanwhile, suggests that global power demand from data centers will increase by 50% by 2027, from 2023 levels, and by as much as 165% by the end of this decade.
Data centers also need large volumes of water to operate. Both this and the energy consumption required to run data centers – whether that be from renewable sources or otherwise – can place pressure on local communities’ power supplies and cause tension and risk. Often, the development of newer energy sources, like small nuclear modular reactors, is lagging the growth in construction of data centers, meaning alternative energy sources are not yet readily available.
The very largest data centers are equivalent in size to about 13 football pitches. And the world’s biggest data center currently is a colossal 10.7 million square feet.
Evolving risks
Like many large buildings or plants, data centers are often located in areas that could be vulnerable to severe weather and natural catastrophe events. Tornadoes, severe connectives storms, wildfire and hail, among other natural phenomena, all could cause significant damage to these multimillion-dollar exposures.
It is vital in the design and construction phase that risk engineering experts are involved to ensure that buildings are sufficiently elevated to reduce flood risk, for example, or that there is sufficient separation between parts of the building so that at-risk infrastructure and equipment are not concentrated in one area. And this risk engineering and risk management mindset is crucial during the operational phase of data centers, too.
Data centers house servers for organisations for which time-sensitivity and providing uninterrupted service is critical; any unexpected downtime is a crucial business interruption risk. This is one of the most significant drivers of insured values and something which insurers and their reinsurance partners must be mindful of as they work with clients to provide coverage.
Meeting the reinsurance challenge
These are not new risks in themselves. But the sheer scale of this next generation of data centers, and their immense demand for energy among other things, makes them almost a unique risk. Cedent insurers and their reinsurer partners need, therefore, to work to understand these risks and ensure that a strong risk management culture is in place at the primary level – and throughout the lifecycle of the data center.
As with many evolving, large-scale risks, there are a small number of well-capitalized and sophisticated lead insurance markets – and these carriers are working closely with their clients to understand the risks and ensure robust risk engineering and management is an integral part of each phase of a data center’s design, construction and operation.
For reinsurers, concentration risk is a challenge. The potential exposures are significant, with coverage likely led by a small number of cedants. And while it is more possible to have visibility of which insurers are leading which lines during the construction phase, once data centers are operational – and housing the servers of myriad clients from around the globe – it becomes more challenging to know exactly which risks are in which treaties as risks are shared and layered.
Reinsurers, therefore, want to work with those cedants that have best-in-class risk engineering capabilities. They may also wish to change some of the treaty language or add to it – for example, to cap the insured values of data centers included to a certain amount. It might also be more manageable to provide coverage for data center-related risks on a ‘special acceptance’ basis, whereby risks that differ from those covered by the main policies in a treaty can be included.
More regular reporting on risks to data centers for which reinsurance coverage is written on a bordereau basis will also likely be necessary as the next generation of data centers comes into operation.
As more massive data centers are built around the world, it will remain vital to have confidence that significant risk engineering has gone into both the construction and operational phase and that risks are well understood and managed at the primary client level. This will mean a continuing dialogue with cedant clients and broker partners as the market seeks to gain greater insights into how data center risk might evolve over time and how it can help to manage and mitigate it.
To contact the author of this story, please complete the below form
More Articles
- By Product
- By Region
Related Resources
Credit & Surety: Resilient in an era of global shocks
Representing in reinsurance and beyond
Global Asset Protection Services, LLC, and its affiliates (“AXA XL Risk Consulting”) provides risk assessment reports and other loss prevention services, as requested. In this respect, our property loss prevention publications, services, and surveys do not address life safety or third party liability issues. This document shall not be construed as indicating the existence or availability under any policy of coverage for any particular type of loss or damage. The provision of any service does not imply that every possible hazard has been identified at a facility or that no other hazards exist. AXA XL Risk Consulting does not assume, and shall have no liability for the control, correction, continuation or modification of any existing conditions or operations. We specifically disclaim any warranty or representation that compliance with any advice or recommendation in any document or other communication will make a facility or operation safe or healthful, or put it in compliance with any standard, code, law, rule or regulation. Save where expressly agreed in writing, AXA XL Risk Consulting and its related and affiliated companies disclaim all liability for loss or damage suffered by any party arising out of or in connection with our services, including indirect or consequential loss or damage, howsoever arising. Any party who chooses to rely in any way on the contents of this document does so at their own risk.
US- and Canada-Issued Insurance Policies
In the US, the AXA XL insurance companies are: Catlin Insurance Company, Inc., Greenwich Insurance Company, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, XL Insurance America, Inc., XL Specialty Insurance Company and T.H.E. Insurance Company. In Canada, coverages are underwritten by XL Specialty Insurance Company - Canadian Branch and AXA Insurance Company - Canadian branch. Coverages may also be underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003. Coverages underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003 are placed on behalf of the member of Syndicate #2003 by Catlin Canada Inc. Lloyd’s ratings are independent of AXA XL.
US domiciled insurance policies can be written by the following AXA XL surplus lines insurers: XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited, Syndicates managed by Catlin Underwriting Agencies Limited and Indian Harbor Insurance Company. Enquires from US residents should be directed to a local insurance agent or broker permitted to write business in the relevant state.
AXA XL, as a controller, uses cookies to provide its services, improve user experience, measure audience engagement, and interact with users’ social network accounts among others. Some of these cookies are optional and we won't set optional cookies unless you enable them by clicking the "ACCEPT ALL" button. You can disable these cookies at any time via the "How to manage your cookie settings" section in our cookie policy.