

Navigating social media's copyright and liability risks
September 09, 2025
By Diane Fazzolari
Claims Manager, Cyber
If your business posts memes, stitches TikToks, drops a Reel with a chart-topping song, or grabs “random” photos and GIFs for a campaign, you’re playing with copyright fire. Statutory damages in the U.S. can run up to $150,000 per work for willful infringement.
Even non willful mistakes can get expensive fast once lawyers, takedowns, and PR fallout enter the picture. The good news? You can lower the risk with tighter workflows, clearer licenses, and—importantly—the right kind of cyber/media liability insurance.
Why social media is a copyright minefield
Handling claims related to digital content often involves navigating complex copyright issues. For example, using trending music from personal accounts to promote Reels on platforms like Instagram and TikTok can trigger takedowns and demand letters, as personal accounts usually have broader access to popular tracks than business accounts, which do not automatically have those rights. Simply accessing music on these platforms doesn’t guarantee protection; it’s crucial to verify whether your account type is authorized for commercial use.
Similarly, memes, GIFs, and reaction images frequently originate from copyrighted material such as movie stills or celebrity photos. The case involving Grumpy Cat underscores that memes possess significant IP value; when a meme benefits a business commercially, securing the rights is essential to avoid disputes. In 2018, Grumpy Cat Limited sued Grenade Beverage LLC for licensing breaches related to unauthorized products and misuse of the cat's likeness, resulting in a $710,001 jury award and establishing a significant legal precedent for meme-based IP rights in the U.S.
Many small businesses assume that using platforms like Giphy automatically grants licensing rights, but licensing terms vary depending on the context, making this a risky assumption.
When it comes to photos found on Google, the issue is just as common. Often, individuals believe that crediting or linking the source suffices, but this does not eliminate copyright risk, especially if the image is used in a way that infringes on rights. Embedding Instagram photos may also pose risks, as U.S. courts are still determining whether embedding constitutes a public display, which can be a critical factor in liability.
Many stock image providers, including Getty Images, aggressively enforces its stock photo copyrights. Several small businesses have been sued or fined for using Getty-owned images on their websites or social channels without purchasing a license. Many businesses paid settlement fees ranging from $500 to $30,000. Even a single image on a Facebook or Instagram post can trigger a demand letter.
Works of art are often protected too, though the copyright may have expired for older works. Copyright protection generally lasts for the life of the artist plus 70 years. While Vincent Van Gogh’s Starry Night may be in the public domain because Van Gogh died in 1890, and its copyright has expired in most countries, a more recent work of art may still be copyright protected.
Fair use isn’t a safety blanket
Fair use is a legal doctrine in U.S. copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright owner for specific purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research. It balances the rights of creators with the public interest by permitting certain uses that do not harm the market value of the original work. When determining fair use, courts consider factors like the purpose of use, the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount used, and the effect on the market.
Fair use is frequently misunderstood, leading many to believe it as a free pass to use copyrighted material without consequences. However, it’s important to recognize that fair use is not an absolute shield—especially in a commercial context.
Fair use is frequently misunderstood, leading many to believe it as a free pass to use copyrighted material without consequences. However, it’s important to recognize that fair use is not an absolute shield—especially in a commercial context.
Practical protocols to stave off risks
When social media activities are primarily commercial, relying on fair use weakens any business’ legal position significantly. To navigate these challenges, here are some practical guardrails to consider:
- Develop a Licensing Playbook
- Use royalty-free music and stock media libraries that explicitly permit commercial social media use.
- Store all licensing documentation in a centralized vault. Having a single repository for licenses makes it easier to respond quickly to claims and provides a stronger legal defense if needed.
- Understand what existing licenses cover. Not all licenses are created equal. For example, while a public performance license may allow a holder to play music in public, it would traditionally not allow for the same song to be used in a commercial or social media post. That would require a sync license.
- Properly Use Platform Music Libraries
- Don’t assume that access to music or media via a platform’s library automatically grants permission for commercial use. Always verify that your business account is covered under the license terms.
- When in doubt, opt for music that is pre-cleared or custom-produced audio to avoid potential infringement issues.
- Centralize User-Generated Content (UGC) Permissions
- Implement a repeatable and consistent release process for UGC. This involves obtaining explicit permissions before posting.
- Store permissions along with relevant metadata in your systems. Avoid relying on verbal agreements or comments as evidence of consent, as these are less defensible in legal disputes.
- Train Your Team
- Educate everyone involved in content creation and posting about copyright basics. Make sure they understand what constitutes infringement and what practices to avoid.
- Regular training helps prevent accidental violations.
- Implement Reviews for Advertising Creative
- Since ads tend to last longer and reach wider audiences, they are attractive targets for intellectual property claims.
- Conduct a thorough pre-flight IP review before launching any advertising campaign, ensuring all content is properly licensed or cleared.
- Maintain a Takedown-Response Checklist
- Establish clear procedures for responding to copyright claims. Define who handles communication with platforms or rights holders, who contacts your insurer, and who manages internal notifications.
- Having a structured plan in place ensures swift and coordinated action, minimizing potential damages or legal exposure.
Following these guardrails can significantly reduce risk of copyright infringement and strengthen your legal position if disputes arise.
Where cyber insurance fits in—and where it doesn’t
From a claims perspective, a cyber or technology Errors & Omissions (E&O) policy with media liability coverage is crucial for addressing issues related to copyright infringement, defamation, or other media disputes.
A comprehensive policy typically covers legal defense costs—whether from demand letters or lawsuits—and can also handle settlements and judgments, subject to specific policy terms and exclusions. Regulatory defense coverage may also be included, especially in disputes involving advertising laws.
However, it’s important to be aware of common exclusions. Claims resulting from knowingly posting infringing content or using copyrighted material without rights may be denied.
Contractual liability exclusions can also apply if your organization guaranteed IP rights in a contract but failed to deliver. Prompt notification to the insurer is essential; delayed reporting can jeopardize coverage.
Final word from the claims desk
Social media is a powerful marketing tool—but from a claims perspective, it’s also a legal risk multiplier. Don’t let your team treat content as disposable. Every song, meme, and image could be a liability. Invest in better processes, smarter tools, and comprehensive insurance coverage. Because once the demand letter lands, your best defense is what you did before it happened.
To contact the author of this story, please complete the below form
More Articles
- By Risk
- By Product
- By Region
Related Resources


Local solutions to global threats: Rethinking cybersecurity in a changing landscape

Why cyber resilience is a priority for private equity portfolio companies
Global Asset Protection Services, LLC, and its affiliates (“AXA XL Risk Consulting”) provides risk assessment reports and other loss prevention services, as requested. In this respect, our property loss prevention publications, services, and surveys do not address life safety or third party liability issues. This document shall not be construed as indicating the existence or availability under any policy of coverage for any particular type of loss or damage. The provision of any service does not imply that every possible hazard has been identified at a facility or that no other hazards exist. AXA XL Risk Consulting does not assume, and shall have no liability for the control, correction, continuation or modification of any existing conditions or operations. We specifically disclaim any warranty or representation that compliance with any advice or recommendation in any document or other communication will make a facility or operation safe or healthful, or put it in compliance with any standard, code, law, rule or regulation. Save where expressly agreed in writing, AXA XL Risk Consulting and its related and affiliated companies disclaim all liability for loss or damage suffered by any party arising out of or in connection with our services, including indirect or consequential loss or damage, howsoever arising. Any party who chooses to rely in any way on the contents of this document does so at their own risk.
US- and Canada-Issued Insurance Policies
In the US, the AXA XL insurance companies are: Catlin Insurance Company, Inc., Greenwich Insurance Company, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, XL Insurance America, Inc., XL Specialty Insurance Company and T.H.E. Insurance Company. In Canada, coverages are underwritten by XL Specialty Insurance Company - Canadian Branch and AXA Insurance Company - Canadian branch. Coverages may also be underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003. Coverages underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003 are placed on behalf of the member of Syndicate #2003 by Catlin Canada Inc. Lloyd’s ratings are independent of AXA XL.
US domiciled insurance policies can be written by the following AXA XL surplus lines insurers: XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited, Syndicates managed by Catlin Underwriting Agencies Limited and Indian Harbor Insurance Company. Enquires from US residents should be directed to a local insurance agent or broker permitted to write business in the relevant state.
AXA XL, as a controller, uses cookies to provide its services, improve user experience, measure audience engagement, and interact with users’ social network accounts among others. Some of these cookies are optional and we won't set optional cookies unless you enable them by clicking the "ACCEPT ALL" button. You can disable these cookies at any time via the "How to manage your cookie settings" section in our cookie policy.