Reinsurance
Product Family

On March 31, 2017 during Atlanta’s evening rush hour, a massive fire erupted underneath an I-85 overpass. The fire started at approximately 6:15 PM in a state-owned storage area under the highway bridge. The storage area contained high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes. The resulting heat from the fire caused the collapse of a 100-foot (30.5 meters) section of I-85 northbound. There is a fire station approximately 1000 ft. (400 m) away from the overpass. As firefighters attacked the fire, the concrete started spalling and the fire fighters were forced to pull back. The bridge collapsed minutes thereafter. Two airport crash trucks were called to the scene and applied foam with good effect. Twelve hours later the fire was still smoldering under the collapsed roadway.

Thankfully, there were no reported injuries to the public or to the fire services responding to the event. Typically, about 250,000 vehicles use this bridge daily. Recent reports indicate that the bridge will be reopened in May; less than two months after the incident due to expedited reconstruction.

The NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) Fire Protection Handbook cites similar fires to the Atlanta bridge fire. All required extensive repairs, but didn’t collapse. Social media posts about the Atlanta bridge collapse expressed general disbelief that such a seemingly innocuous fuel load such as HDPE pipes could cause such a major fire and collapse. It must be remembered that bridges might not be designed to resist a fire like this, even though they are of massive noncombustible construction.

What loss prevention lessons can be gleaned from this incident?

  • Do not store anything underneath critical highway infrastructure if it is not protected against collapse and deformation. The protection should be such that the highway can be used after the fire is extinguished. NFPA 502 fire locations for a 300+ MW (megawatt) fire should be used. Three MWs are approximately the same as 1 burning couch; therefor 300 MWs can be correlated to 100 burning couches.

  • Critical ingress/egress routes should be evaluated for fire exposure underneath these routes. 

  • Even massive noncombustible construction can collapse from an uncontrolled fire if not specifically designed to resist fire, including the structural connections. The fire load, though heavy, was well below what is found in many industrial and storage facilities based on video footage and it was within the design fire range specified in NFPA 502.  In the cases of the bridges mentioned above that did not collapse, major repairs or complete replacement were still needed. Fire resistance tests do not mean that a structure will be useable after a fire unless specifically designed for mission continuity.  

  • Spalling concrete is a tremendous danger to firefighters. In standard fire resistance tests, spalling is allowed. Manual firefighting in a well-developed, high fuel load fire, even in fire resistive construction cannot be relied upon.

  • Proximity to the fire station has once again been shown to have minimal effect on the outcome. Quick notification of the fire service and rapid accessibility to the fire before it grows out of control are the key factors. Sprinklers have proven to be best way to get water on the fire quickly. In occupancies where sprinklers are not typically installed, a major fire can be expected. Our research has shown that even the best public fire brigade located next to a facility is not a substitute for sprinklers. Well trained on-site fire brigades with early smoke detection systems can be effective in many (but not all) circumstances.    

Our research has shown that even the best public fire brigade located next to a facility is not a substitute for sprinklers.

Based on media photos, the Atlanta bridge appears to have failed at the connections to the supporting pier. “Concrete starts to crack at 500 ºF, suffers large cracks at 1,000 ºF and melts at 2,5000 ºF, ” says Andy Herrmann, a past president of the American Society of Civil Engineers and a 40-year consulting engineer in New York City.

While bridge collapses are not unheard of, most collapses are the result of overturned gasoline tankers, such as the 2007 I-580 East Connector collapse in Oakland, CA. A tanker truck carrying 8,600 gallons (32554.5 liters)  of unleaded gasoline overturned on the connector from Interstate 80 West (from Berkeley) to Interstate 880 south at 3:42 AM on Sunday, April 29, 2007. The intense heat from the fuel spill weakened the steel structure of the roadway above, which served as the connecting ramp from I-80 (from San Francisco) to I-580 East (Oakland).  About 168 feet (51 meters) of the upper roadway collapsed onto the lower connector. The truck driver suffered second degree burns on his hands, but was able to walk 1.5 miles (2.4 kilometers) to a gas station, where he found a taxi and was given a ride to Oakland Kaiser Medical Center. No other vehicles or persons were reported to be involved in the accident. On May 7, 2007, the I-880 connector re-opened at 4:30 AM to traffic. Substantial work was done to retrofit the strength of the structure, which had sunk nine inches (22 centimeters) due to the collapse of the I-580 connector onto the I-880 connector.   

Contrary to public perception, heat can damage concrete and it can cause reinforcing or any structural steel to lose strength. Think of World Trade Center 7 which collapsed because of slow-burning fires, not explosive jet fuel. Fire can defeat concrete and steel.  

John A. Frank, P.E., FSFPE, CPCU is Senior Vice President of XL Catlin’s Property Risk Engineering Loss Prevention Center of Excellence.   He can be reached via email at john.frank@xlcatlin.com or via phone at +1 404-431-2673.

Subscribe

Global Asset Protection Services, LLC, and its affiliates (“AXA XL Risk Consulting”) provides risk assessment reports and other loss prevention services, as requested. This document shall not be construed as indicating the existence or availability under any policy of coverage for any particular type of loss or damage. AXA XL Risk. We specifically disclaim any warranty or representation that compliance with any advice or recommendation in any publication will make a facility or operation safe or healthful, or put it in compliance with any standard, code, law, rule or regulation. Save where expressly agreed in writing, AXA XL Risk Consulting and its related and affiliated companies disclaim all liability for loss or damage suffered by any party arising out of or in connection with this publication, including indirect or consequential loss or damage, howsoever arising. Any party who chooses to rely in any way on the contents of this document does so at their own risk.

US- and Canada-Issued Insurance Policies

In the US, the AXA XL insurance companies are: AXA Insurance Company, Catlin Insurance Company, Inc., Greenwich Insurance Company, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, XL Insurance America, Inc., XL Specialty Insurance Company and T.H.E. Insurance Company. In Canada, coverages are underwritten by XL Specialty Insurance Company - Canadian Branch and AXA Insurance Company - Canadian branch. Coverages may also be underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003. Coverages underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003 are placed on behalf of the member of Syndicate #2003 by Catlin Canada Inc. Lloyd’s ratings are independent of AXA XL.
US domiciled insurance policies can be written by the following AXA XL surplus lines insurers: XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited, Syndicates managed by Catlin Underwriting Agencies Limited and Indian Harbor Insurance Company. Enquires from US residents should be directed to a local insurance agent or broker permitted to write business in the relevant state.