Product Family


Underwriter, Political Risk, Credit and Bond, Asia Pacific, AXA XL

Credit insurance can unlock greater financing for critical infrastructure projects and support lending to micro-, small- and medium-sized businesses in emerging markets.

A commonly held belief supposes that many of the world's problems could be solved "if only we had more money". While not entirely wrong, this view is largely misplaced. Globally, money in myriad forms is not in short supply. Instead, structural and institutional factors are the more significant impediments to creating the conditions that help people live more comfortably and securely.

In this article, I describe how the insurance industry—namely, the Political Risk, Credit and Bond segment —is collaborating with other organisations and institutions to overcome some of these impediments and, by so doing, helping reduce poverty and creating shared prosperity.

A region of contrasts
I am based in Singapore and work with clients and brokers to support cross-border trade and investment in the Asia-Pacific region. Among the noteworthy features of this part of the world are its contrasts. The countries are culturally diverse and have vastly different legal, regulatory, and tax requirements. These multiple contrasts often present complexities and challenges for financial institutions and investors looking to support regional trade and economic development. At the same time, the region's dynamic growth has created opportunities for higher risk-adjusted returns.

In fact, infrastructure investment in the various Asia-Pacific countries over the past decade has been more significant than in other developing regions. And it shows: visitors from different parts of the world marvel at the gleaming new airports, modern highways and widespread availability of high-speed internet, to cite just a few examples of recent progress. Nonetheless, the infrastructure in most of the region's developing countries remains far from adequate, and many people lack proper access to basic sanitation, healthcare and electricity. Moreover, the pandemic only magnified these shortcomings and further highlighted the importance of infrastructure development in supporting vulnerable populations.

There are also striking contrasts between the financial markets in the different countries across the region. Places like Australia and Singapore have robust and comprehensive finance sectors that are well-equipped to support local and cross-border trade and development. However, the financial industry is less well-developed in most of the region's emerging economies, and structural deficiencies are common. In particular, the financial inclusion gap—the inability of individuals and businesses to access useful and affordable financial products and services—remains significant in most emerging market countries. The challenges are particularly acute for women, low-income households and micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) which can't easily access whatever credit is available locally.

Mobilising private capital
Limited financial resources are a common denominator for both broad issues—inadequate infrastructure development and the financial inclusion gap. However, as I noted at the outset, the world's money supply, in all its various forms, isn't the issue. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) notes, for instance, that only 0.8 percent of the private capital managed globally by pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and other institutional investors has been allocated to infrastructure in recent years.

The challenge is how to mobilise more of this private capital since, in many of Asia's emerging market countries, traditional lending channels have finite capacity and a limited pipeline of properly structured projects. The needs are even more acute currently as countries work to recover from the pandemic.

The International Finance Corporation (IFC)—the World Bank Group division that works with the private sector—has a similar assessment. It points out that since the 2008 global financial crisis, international banks have grown more cautious about financing private-sector projects in emerging market countries, "especially for longer tenors". The IFC also notes that "With low yields in developed markets, many institutional investors are seeking higher-yield opportunities … and have exhibited a strong desire for debt instruments from emerging market financial institutions in particular".

Expanding access to finance
To sum up: There are many ways targeted investments could positively impact people in the Asia-Pacific region, from needed infrastructure improvements to supporting financial inclusion. And the private sector controls significant volumes of capital that could be deployed for these purposes.

What's missing? According to the IFC, "new structures (are needed) that can connect the holders of capital and those institutions able to bear risk with emerging market beneficiaries in search of financing".

That is where insurance, and specifically credit risk insurance, comes in. Multilateral organisations, government agencies and private insurance companies often offer credit insurance to protect against a borrower's non-payment of a debt obligation. By partnering with a credit insurance provider who assumes a portion of the risk, institutional investors, financial institutions or other "holders of capital" can provide beneficiaries with funding that otherwise wouldn't have been available or with a financial package greater than what the lender could have delivered on its own. In some cases, the investor, whoever it may be, might also take out political risk insurance to mitigate country risk and losses stemming from civil strife, expropriation or related disruptions.

For instance, in 2020, the IFC and a consortium of six insurers, including AXA XL, launched an initiative aiming to channel up to USD five billion of lending through the financial systems in developing countries, including those in Asia-Pacific. That is USD two billion more than the IFC could have offered without the credit insurance component since it helps financiers manage their internal limits and risk tolerances while also satisfying regulatory capital requirements.

One of the exciting aspects of this approach is that it is readily scalable and replicable. In addition to this IFC/World Bank initiative, similar efforts are underway with the ADB and other multilateral development agencies to use political risk and credit insurance to expand their lending capacities.

Thus, by helping mobilise "holders of capital", political risk and credit insurance specialists play an important role in supporting cross-border trade and investment in emerging markets. Facilitating access to the world's financial resources is becoming even more vital as emerging market countries seek to bolster their resilience to climate change and promote economic development for women, low-income households and MSMEs. And, over time, the opportunity to manage political and credit risk with insurance should encourage additional "holders of capital" to participate in emerging market finance and foster new linkages between firms in developing countries and international financial institutions.

Thomas Ng is an underwriter with AXA XL's Political Risk, Credit and Bond team. In this role, he works with financiers, investors and corporates to develop structured credit and political risk solutions in emerging markets. He joined AXA XL in 2017 after serving in analytical roles in banking and with a credit rating agency. He is based in Singapore and can be contacted at

To contact the author of this story, please complete the below form

Invalid First Name
Invalid Last Name
Country is required
Invalid email
Invalid Captcha

More Articles

Global Asset Protection Services, LLC, and its affiliates (“AXA XL Risk Consulting”) provides risk assessment reports and other loss prevention services, as requested. This document shall not be construed as indicating the existence or availability under any policy of coverage for any particular type of loss or damage. AXA XL Risk. We specifically disclaim any warranty or representation that compliance with any advice or recommendation in any publication will make a facility or operation safe or healthful, or put it in compliance with any standard, code, law, rule or regulation. Save where expressly agreed in writing, AXA XL Risk Consulting and its related and affiliated companies disclaim all liability for loss or damage suffered by any party arising out of or in connection with this publication, including indirect or consequential loss or damage, howsoever arising. Any party who chooses to rely in any way on the contents of this document does so at their own risk.

US- and Canada-Issued Insurance Policies

In the US, the AXA XL insurance companies are: AXA Insurance Company, Catlin Insurance Company, Inc., Greenwich Insurance Company, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, XL Insurance America, Inc., XL Specialty Insurance Company and T.H.E. Insurance Company. In Canada, coverages are underwritten by XL Specialty Insurance Company - Canadian Branch and AXA Insurance Company - Canadian branch. Coverages may also be underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003. Coverages underwritten by Lloyd’s Syndicate #2003 are placed on behalf of the member of Syndicate #2003 by Catlin Canada Inc. Lloyd’s ratings are independent of AXA XL.
US domiciled insurance policies can be written by the following AXA XL surplus lines insurers: XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited, Syndicates managed by Catlin Underwriting Agencies Limited and Indian Harbor Insurance Company. Enquires from US residents should be directed to a local insurance agent or broker permitted to write business in the relevant state.